0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
43%
Nuke
25%
Ancient
24%
Mirage
12%
Inferno
11%
Anubis
5%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
1
Dust II
86%
7
0
Nuke
56%
9
2
Ancient
33%
6
2
Mirage
44%
9
0
Inferno
44%
9
0
Anubis
50%
10
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
6
21
Dust II
43%
14
16
Nuke
31%
26
2
Ancient
57%
49
1
Mirage
56%
27
2
Inferno
33%
3
17
Anubis
55%
44
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlww
- lwwww
Info
Map Analysis of Lazer Cats vs FLuffy Gangsters by the Bo3.gg Team
FLuffy Gangsters on Anubis Analysis
FLuffy Gangsters demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FLuffy Gangsters on Anubis were Djon8, who contributed 32 kills, and h1ghnesS, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9077 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, FLuffy Gangsters held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lazer Cats on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Lazer Cats, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lazer Cats on Anubis included nikitea, who contributed 17 kills, and 7oX1C, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7658 total damage, Lazer Cats couldn't prevent FLuffy Gangsters from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments