Norway Scoreboard Ancient (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

17

6

+5

104

2:3

6

0

6.8

+19%

21

16

2

+5

84

2:4

7

0

6.5

+11%

16

12

5

+4

67

1:2

4

0

6.0

+16%

12

17

4

-5

61

3:3

3

1

5.6

-10%

12

14

8

-2

73

1:2

3

0

5.2

-1%

Total

83

76

25

+7

390

9:14

23

1

6.0

+7%

Latvia Scoreboard Ancient (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

20

16

7

+4

87

4:1

5

1

7.2

+4%

16

15

5

+1

84

3:3

5

0

6.3

+12%

14

16

2

-2

62

4:1

1

0

5.7

-5%

13

21

8

-8

66

3:2

2

0

5.4

-16%

13

15

4

-2

68

0:2

3

0

5.3

-5%

Total

76

83

26

-7

367

14:9

16

1

6.0

-2%

Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Norway vs Latvia by the Bo3.gg Team

Norway on Ancient Analysis

Norway demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Norway on Ancient were Grus, who contributed 22 kills, and SLY, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8965 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, Norway held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Latvia on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Latvia, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Latvia on Ancient included Frip, who contributed 20 kills, and rud, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8446 total damage, Latvia couldn't prevent Norway from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, Latvia struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date