0 Comments
76
78
18
-2
356
10:13
16
0
+10%
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
59%
Inferno
45%
Vertigo
36%
Mirage
25%
Nuke
2%
Ancient
2%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
1
2
Inferno
0%
0
4
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Mirage
60%
5
0
Nuke
40%
5
0
Ancient
50%
6
0
Overpass
0%
1
2
Last 5 maps
Anubis
59%
34
5
Inferno
45%
20
11
Vertigo
36%
33
3
Mirage
35%
23
14
Nuke
42%
26
19
Ancient
52%
44
2
Overpass
0%
0
53
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- wwwll
Info
Map Analysis of lajtbitexe vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team
PGE Turow on Nuke Analysis
PGE Turow demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for PGE Turow on Nuke were Markoś, who contributed 23 kills, and kadziu, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8586 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, PGE Turow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
lajtbitexe on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for lajtbitexe, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for lajtbitexe on Nuke included TOAO, who contributed 19 kills, and Baljs, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8186 total damage, lajtbitexe couldn't prevent PGE Turow from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, lajtbitexe struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments