0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
13.93.4
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
16.14
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
23.95.8
USP kills on a map
31.6074
Shots (total/round)
12816
Shots (total/round)
13816
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Inferno
57%
Mirage
45%
Ancient
23%
Nuke
17%
Anubis
17%
Vertigo
13%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
1
21
Mirage
13%
8
12
Ancient
46%
13
8
Nuke
50%
6
4
Anubis
29%
7
4
Vertigo
67%
6
13
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
2
Inferno
57%
14
13
Mirage
58%
12
21
Ancient
69%
16
17
Nuke
67%
6
39
Anubis
46%
13
29
Vertigo
80%
10
19
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of LAG vs NRG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LAG and NRG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by NRG. The MVP of this match was HexT.
NRG analytics
The team NRG secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NRG were HexT contributed 18 kills and oSee contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7320 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NRG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LAG analytics
The team LAG managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LAG were nicx contributed 13 kills and ogwizard contributed 10 kills. 5555 of total damage by LAG could not prevent NRG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LAG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments