0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
14.23.5
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
20.44
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3023
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.33.5
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:27s00:37s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6329
HE damage (avg/round)
16.23.4
USP damage (avg/round)
19.44.7
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
40%
Inferno
33%
Anubis
27%
Ancient
25%
Vertigo
13%
Nuke
4%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
14%
7
12
Inferno
0%
1
21
Anubis
29%
7
4
Ancient
46%
13
8
Vertigo
75%
4
13
Nuke
60%
5
4
Last 5 maps
Mirage
54%
13
34
Inferno
33%
15
25
Anubis
56%
18
20
Ancient
71%
28
6
Vertigo
88%
24
5
Nuke
56%
9
28
Info
Match analysis of LAG vs M80 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LAG and M80, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by M80. The MVP of this match was experative.
M80 analytics
The team M80 secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for M80 were slaxz- contributed 15 kills and malbsMd contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7200 overall damage.
On the defensive side, M80 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LAG analytics
The team LAG managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LAG were experative contributed 15 kills and nicx contributed 15 kills. 5806 of total damage by LAG could not prevent M80 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LAG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments