Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
146.4049
AWP damage (avg/round)
64.221.6
USP kills on a map
51.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
22.64.8
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
19.34.1
HE damage (avg/round)
15.53.4
USP damage (avg/round)
144.8
Assists on a map
104.4315
Headshots on a map
180.3159
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
67%
Vertigo
56%
Nuke
46%
Ancient
11%
Anubis
11%
Mirage
9%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
42
Vertigo
44%
16
8
Nuke
29%
7
12
Ancient
44%
25
14
Anubis
39%
18
11
Mirage
38%
16
19
Dust II
17%
6
20
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
3
5
Vertigo
100%
1
8
Nuke
75%
4
6
Ancient
55%
11
1
Anubis
50%
6
1
Mirage
47%
15
0
Dust II
17%
6
8
Info
Match analysis of LAG vs Akimbo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LAG and Akimbo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by LAG. The MVP of this match was nicx.
LAG analytics
The team LAG secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LAG were nicx contributed 72 kills and rayxts contributed 58 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28281 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LAG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Akimbo analytics
The team Akimbo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Akimbo were N20AmZ contributed 64 kills and taggy contributed 59 kills. 27527 of total damage by Akimbo could not prevent LAG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Akimbo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments