0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
M4A1 kills on a map
94.5517
Assists on a map
9.014.3808
Headshots on a map
14.960.3126
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Nuke
67%
Mirage
43%
Ancient
32%
Inferno
17%
Anubis
13%
Vertigo
7%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
33%
9
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Anubis
33%
12
0
Vertigo
33%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
67%
3
5
Nuke
0%
0
9
Mirage
43%
14
1
Ancient
65%
20
0
Inferno
33%
3
3
Anubis
46%
13
0
Vertigo
40%
10
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- lwwlw
Info
Match analysis of L&G vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between L&G and Passion UA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Passion UA. The MVP of this match was jackasmo.
Passion UA analytics
The team Passion UA secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Passion UA were jackasmo contributed 18 kills and s-chilla contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7252 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
L&G analytics
The team L&G managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for L&G were OneUn1que contributed 10 kills and kr1vda contributed 12 kills. 5464 of total damage by L&G could not prevent Passion UA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments