Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
USP kills on a map
31.6027
M4A1 kills on a map
114.4189
Kills on a map
26.4116.9373
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:20s01:55s
Player score (round)
46191010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
80%
Ancient
61%
Vertigo
57%
Inferno
56%
Anubis
48%
Mirage
42%
Nuke
17%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
5
1
Ancient
61%
23
0
Vertigo
57%
7
1
Inferno
44%
9
1
Anubis
52%
23
0
Mirage
58%
12
1
Nuke
50%
2
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
1
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Inferno
100%
2
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
2
1
Nuke
33%
3
1
Info
Match analysis of Leo vs Partizan by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Leo and Partizan, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by Partizan. The MVP of this match was OneUn1que.
Partizan analytics
The team Partizan secured 0 out of 59 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps . They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Partizan were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Partizan held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Leo analytics
The team Leo managed to secure 27 out of 59 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Leo were OneUn1que contributed 42 kills and Malkiss contributed 42 kills. 20430 of total damage by Leo could not prevent Partizan from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Leo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments