0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
94.5517
USP kills on a map
31.6107
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3025
Speed Round (sec)
00:26s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:54s
Player score (round)
35191011
Player score (round)
36681011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
60%
Vertigo
57%
Mirage
54%
Inferno
22%
Anubis
20%
Ancient
3%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
67%
3
0
Anubis
30%
10
0
Ancient
50%
6
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
60%
15
7
Vertigo
43%
14
13
Mirage
54%
28
11
Inferno
45%
11
25
Anubis
50%
12
28
Ancient
53%
17
17
Nuke
69%
32
1
Info
Match analysis of L&G vs Espionage by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between L&G and Espionage, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Espionage. The MVP of this match was Cabbi.
Espionage analytics
The team Espionage secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Espionage were Cabbi contributed 19 kills and Lucky contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7535 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Espionage held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
L&G analytics
The team L&G managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for L&G were crickeyyy contributed 14 kills and jackast contributed 10 kills. 5233 of total damage by L&G could not prevent Espionage from securing the victory
On the defensive side, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments