0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4531
Deagle kills on a map
41.6362
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3022
M4A1 kills on a map
124.306
Speed Round (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Player score (round)
45141010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
35%
Nuke
27%
Train
25%
Inferno
13%
Anubis
9%
Dust II
8%
Ancient
6%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
75%
8
0
Nuke
67%
3
1
Train
50%
2
0
Inferno
50%
2
2
Anubis
43%
7
0
Dust II
67%
9
0
Ancient
56%
16
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
40%
5
21
Nuke
40%
5
8
Train
25%
4
0
Inferno
63%
19
4
Anubis
34%
29
2
Dust II
75%
16
10
Ancient
50%
16
7
Info
Match analysis of Kubix vs Rhyno by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Kubix and Rhyno, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Train, and victory was secured by Rhyno. The MVP of this match was P3R3IIRA.
Rhyno analytics
The team Rhyno secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Train. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rhyno were P3R3IIRA contributed 29 kills and Icarus contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10015 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rhyno held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Kubix analytics
The team Kubix managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Kubix were Caley contributed 21 kills and gejmzilla contributed 18 kills. 8029 of total damage by Kubix could not prevent Rhyno from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Kubix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments