0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
Deagle kills on a map
61.6427
Player score (round)
37411010
Player score (round)
45271010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42271010
Player score (round)
52811010
Damage (total/round)
40573
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Inferno
50%
Vertigo
29%
Ancient
25%
Anubis
23%
Nuke
20%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
6
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Ancient
75%
8
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Nuke
100%
1
2
Mirage
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
12
0
Inferno
0%
0
3
Vertigo
29%
7
1
Ancient
50%
14
0
Anubis
27%
15
1
Nuke
80%
5
3
Mirage
67%
6
2
Info
Match analysis of Kubix vs PeeP by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Kubix and PeeP, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Kubix. The MVP of this match was Wadeshot.
Kubix analytics
The team Kubix secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Kubix were ammar contributed 29 kills and gejmzilla contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11943 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Kubix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PeeP analytics
The team PeeP managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PeeP were Wadeshot contributed 28 kills and yiksrezo contributed 26 kills. 12341 of total damage by PeeP could not prevent Kubix from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PeeP struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments