0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
146.3324
AK47 kills on a map
146.4203
M4A1 kills on a map
104.3478
Kills on a map
2716.7206
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
45661010
Damage (total/round)
40273
Player score (round)
42041010
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Nuke
63%
Inferno
50%
Mirage
27%
Ancient
18%
Anubis
14%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
2
Inferno
50%
2
0
Mirage
67%
3
0
Ancient
71%
7
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Nuke
63%
8
0
Inferno
0%
3
0
Mirage
40%
10
0
Ancient
53%
15
0
Anubis
36%
11
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Info
Match analysis of Kubix vs Arrow by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Kubix and Arrow, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Kubix. The MVP of this match was ammar.
Kubix analytics
The team Kubix secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Kubix were ammar contributed 27 kills and gejmzilla contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8701 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Kubix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Arrow analytics
The team Arrow managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Arrow were Kre1N contributed 17 kills and Orbit contributed 15 kills. 7301 of total damage by Arrow could not prevent Kubix from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Arrow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments