0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Player score (round)
36051010
Player score (round)
40891010
Damage (total/round)
39273
Player score (round)
42981010
Player score (round)
38701010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Inferno
78%
Mirage
67%
Anubis
65%
Nuke
57%
Ancient
11%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
3
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
1
Ancient
50%
4
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
4
3
Inferno
78%
9
3
Mirage
67%
12
4
Anubis
35%
17
3
Nuke
57%
7
9
Ancient
61%
18
3
Vertigo
0%
1
20
Info
Match analysis of Kubix vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Kubix and 500, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by 500. The MVP of this match was Oxygen.
500 analytics
The team 500 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 500 were Oxygen contributed 22 kills and SPELLAN contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12054 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Kubix analytics
The team Kubix managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Kubix were rosoneriii contributed 23 kills and tripey contributed 26 kills. 10760 of total damage by Kubix could not prevent 500 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Kubix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments