0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
50%
Ancient
45%
Nuke
42%
Inferno
40%
Vertigo
25%
Mirage
12%
Dust II
5%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
8
Ancient
45%
11
1
Nuke
67%
12
0
Inferno
63%
24
0
Vertigo
25%
4
6
Mirage
50%
12
2
Dust II
20%
10
5
Last 5 maps
Overpass
50%
6
12
Ancient
0%
0
16
Nuke
25%
4
10
Inferno
23%
13
5
Vertigo
0%
3
14
Mirage
38%
8
11
Dust II
25%
8
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwwl
- lllll
Info
Map Analysis of KTRL vs Eternal Fire Academy by the Bo3.gg Team
KTRL on Inferno Analysis
KTRL demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 25 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for KTRL on Inferno were susp, who contributed 25 kills, and dEE, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9678 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, KTRL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Eternal Fire Academy on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Eternal Fire Academy, as they managed to secure 0 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Eternal Fire Academy on Inferno included EMSTAR, who contributed 18 kills, and TR0JN, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8363 total damage, Eternal Fire Academy couldn't prevent KTRL from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Eternal Fire Academy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments