0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:22s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:25s
AWP kills on a map
156.4049
AWP damage (avg/round)
60.921.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.62.1
Player score (round)
36881010
Damage (total/round)
42973
Player score (round)
39961010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
67%
Ancient
48%
Anubis
39%
Nuke
24%
Dust II
18%
Mirage
16%
Vertigo
5%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
5
45
Ancient
52%
31
8
Anubis
35%
26
12
Nuke
48%
29
9
Dust II
63%
27
6
Mirage
38%
13
14
Vertigo
63%
8
30
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
33
28
Ancient
100%
1
94
Anubis
74%
47
20
Nuke
72%
57
5
Dust II
81%
16
18
Mirage
54%
26
44
Vertigo
68%
40
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of KRÜ vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between KRÜ and paiN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by paiN. The MVP of this match was lux.
paiN analytics
The team paiN secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for paiN were lux contributed 20 kills and nqz contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8991 overall damage.
On the defensive side, paiN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KRÜ analytics
The team KRÜ managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KRÜ were deco contributed 19 kills and atarax1a contributed 18 kills. 8100 of total damage by KRÜ could not prevent paiN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KRÜ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments