0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
31.8168
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.36
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.33.6
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.3232
AWP kills on a map
146.3324
AWP damage (avg/round)
84.421.6
USP kills on a map
31.5986
USP damage (avg/round)
194.8
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
20.84.2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
67%
Anubis
27%
Nuke
13%
Ancient
10%
Dust II
5%
Vertigo
3%
Mirage
2%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
5
49
Anubis
35%
26
15
Nuke
48%
33
10
Ancient
50%
32
9
Dust II
62%
29
7
Vertigo
67%
9
31
Mirage
38%
13
15
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
12
29
Anubis
62%
42
3
Nuke
61%
28
23
Ancient
60%
25
9
Dust II
67%
3
39
Vertigo
64%
36
5
Mirage
40%
25
33
Info
Match analysis of KRÜ vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between KRÜ and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was saffee.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 26 kills and Lucaozy contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7411 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KRÜ analytics
The team KRÜ managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KRÜ were righi contributed 11 kills and atarax1a contributed 8 kills. 3832 of total damage by KRÜ could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KRÜ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments