KRÜ Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

16

4

+1

80

2:4

4

0

6.1

+7%

14

16

0

-2

57

3:2

4

1

5.6

-10%

16

22

4

-6

69

2:3

3

0

5.6

-17%

13

19

5

-6

65

1:3

3

0

5.2

-11%

8

20

7

-12

42

3:1

2

0

4.5

-33%

Total

68

93

20

-25

314

11:13

16

1

5.4

-13%

Case Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

15

3

+6

85

5:1

5

1

7.2

+32%

20

14

6

+6

88

3:2

6

0

6.7

+26%

19

14

5

+5

85

2:4

6

0

6.2

+15%

16

12

3

+4

64

0:1

3

0

6.0

+6%

14

15

5

-1

69

3:3

1

0

6.0

-7%

Total

90

70

22

+20

391

13:11

21

1

6.4

+14%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of KRÜ vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team

Case on Nuke Analysis

Case demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Case on Nuke were RICIOLI, who contributed 21 kills, and yepz, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9383 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


KRÜ on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for KRÜ, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for KRÜ on Nuke included deco, who contributed 17 kills, and righi, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7525 total damage, KRÜ couldn't prevent Case from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, KRÜ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date