0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
83%
Ancient
56%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
33%
Inferno
17%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
3
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
83%
6
0
Ancient
56%
9
0
Overpass
50%
4
1
Nuke
33%
3
0
Inferno
17%
6
0
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Mirage
0%
1
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- lwlll
Info
Map Analysis of Genk vs TUSTE CHOPAKI by the Bo3.gg Team
TUSTE CHOPAKI on Anubis Analysis
TUSTE CHOPAKI demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for TUSTE CHOPAKI on Anubis were asran, who contributed 19 kills, and GruBy, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8001 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, TUSTE CHOPAKI held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Genk on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Genk, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Genk on Anubis included Wumbo, who contributed 16 kills, and MAGILA, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6480 total damage, Genk couldn't prevent TUSTE CHOPAKI from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Genk struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments