Genk Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

31

25

4

+6

80

2:3

9

0

6.6

+3%

25

24

6

+1

74

2:4

5

0

6.1

+15%

21

21

6

0

61

2:5

5

1

5.7

-7%

20

24

6

-4

62

5:6

5

0

5.6

-5%

13

25

4

-12

54

0:7

4

0

4.5

-23%

Total

110

119

26

-9

331

11:25

28

1

5.7

-4%

Eternal Fire Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

37

23

8

+14

117

6:3

11

1

8.4

+18%

28

22

3

+6

74

9:3

4

2

7.2

+8%

19

22

13

-3

64

4:1

5

0

6.1

-6%

20

24

7

-4

64

3:3

4

0

5.8

-15%

15

19

1

-4

53

3:1

2

1

5.5

-13%

Total

119

110

32

+9

371

25:11

26

4

6.6

-2%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Genk vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team

Eternal Fire on Inferno Analysis

Eternal Fire demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Eternal Fire on Inferno were XANTARES, who contributed 37 kills, and imoRR, who added 28 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 13369 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Genk on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Genk, as they managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Genk on Inferno included Ryu, who contributed 31 kills, and Crepow, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11906 total damage, Genk couldn't prevent Eternal Fire from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Genk struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date