0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Nuke
46%
Vertigo
40%
Overpass
17%
Inferno
8%
Ancient
8%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
5
Nuke
46%
13
0
Vertigo
25%
8
1
Overpass
57%
7
1
Inferno
50%
2
2
Ancient
33%
6
3
Mirage
50%
4
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
12
6
Nuke
0%
2
10
Vertigo
65%
17
7
Overpass
74%
23
1
Inferno
58%
26
0
Ancient
41%
17
1
Mirage
50%
8
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwlw
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of Genk vs ALTERNATE aTTaX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Genk and ALTERNATE aTTaX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by ALTERNATE aTTaX. The MVP of this match was PANIX.
ALTERNATE aTTaX analytics
The team ALTERNATE aTTaX secured 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX were PANIX contributed 29 kills and PerX contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12485 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Genk analytics
The team Genk managed to secure 30 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Genk were ReFuZR contributed 23 kills and ryu contributed 19 kills. 10511 of total damage by Genk could not prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Genk struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments