0 Comments
99
104
14
-5
373
14:15
25
3
Dust II6
0%
Teams advantage
Score
6.1
6
Dust II0.1
Win Rounds
16
13
Dust II3
Kills
105
99
Dust II6
Damage
11.24K
10.81K
Dust II433
Economy
625.55K
592.8K
Dust II32750
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
59%
Dust II
50%
Ancient
43%
Inferno
38%
Mirage
38%
Vertigo
20%
Overpass
17%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
59%
22
0
Dust II
50%
2
17
Ancient
43%
14
0
Inferno
38%
16
4
Mirage
38%
16
3
Vertigo
20%
5
1
Overpass
17%
6
14
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
Info
Match analysis of KOVA vs sickboyzz by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between KOVA and sickboyzz, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by KOVA. The MVP of this match was ValkoO.
KOVA analytics
The team KOVA secured 0 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KOVA were uli contributed 22 kills and ottoNd contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11239 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KOVA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
sickboyzz analytics
The team sickboyzz managed to secure 29 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for sickboyzz were ValkoO contributed 27 kills and seael contributed 21 kills. 10806 of total damage by sickboyzz could not prevent KOVA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, sickboyzz struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments