77
81
26
-4
369
0:0
0
0
0%
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
75%
Inferno
74%
Ancient
60%
Dust II
53%
Anubis
50%
Train
46%
Mirage
i
40%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
75%
8
25
Inferno
74%
43
6
Ancient
60%
63
0
Dust II
53%
36
11
Anubis
50%
26
23
Train
46%
13
6
Mirage
60%
43
6
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Train
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- wl
Info
Map Analysis of kONO vs informmix by the Bo3.gg Team
informmix on Mirage Analysis
informmix demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for informmix on Mirage were syrsoN, who contributed 19 kills, and k1to, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, informmix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
kONO on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for kONO, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for kONO on Mirage included amster, who contributed 15 kills, and OWNER, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, kONO couldn't prevent informmix from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, kONO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments