Ended
1
kONO
0 - 2
GenOne
Basic stats

0 Comments

kONO Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

16

2

+7

115

5:2

4

0

8.7

+24%

10

14

3

-4

72

2:0

3

0

5.7

-11%

10

17

5

-7

75

2:2

1

0

5.5

-18%

7

16

3

-9

53

0:4

0

0

4.2

-29%

5

13

1

-8

21

0:2

1

0

3.5

-47%

Total

55

76

14

-21

335

9:10

9

0

5.5

-16%

GenOne Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

8

2

+14

96

1:0

5

1

8.1

+32%

19

11

4

+8

95

1:3

6

1

7.2

+32%

13

11

9

+2

102

3:3

4

0

6.9

+17%

15

13

5

+2

81

2:2

4

0

6.2

+6%

7

13

6

-6

47

3:1

2

0

5.3

-19%

Total

76

56

26

+20

422

10:9

21

2

6.7

+14%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of kONO vs GenOne by the Bo3.gg Team

GenOne on Anubis Analysis

GenOne demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GenOne on Anubis were Kursy, who contributed 22 kills, and Brooxsy, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8009 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, GenOne held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


kONO on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for kONO, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for kONO on Anubis included kensizor, who contributed 23 kills, and amster, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6370 total damage, kONO couldn't prevent GenOne from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, kONO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date