0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:22s01:27s
Tec-9 kills on a map
41.3025
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
23.43.5
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3025
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.55.7
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
35521011
Damage (total/round)
39073
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Nuke
55%
Overpass
40%
Vertigo
17%
Ancient
12%
Anubis
12%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
8
Nuke
80%
5
0
Overpass
0%
0
7
Vertigo
50%
4
1
Ancient
50%
4
0
Anubis
100%
1
4
Inferno
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
6
2
Nuke
25%
8
10
Overpass
40%
5
11
Vertigo
33%
3
12
Ancient
62%
13
2
Anubis
88%
8
2
Inferno
0%
1
23
Info
Match analysis of KOI vs PERA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between KOI and PERA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by KOI. The MVP of this match was mopoz.
KOI analytics
The team KOI secured 26 out of 39 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KOI were mopoz contributed 37 kills and stadodo contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16520 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KOI held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PERA analytics
The team PERA managed to secure 13 out of 39 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PERA were Aaron contributed 30 kills and Porya contributed 29 kills. 12977 of total damage by PERA could not prevent KOI from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PERA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments