Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:30s
USP kills on a map
41.616
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0371
M4A4 kills on a map
123.6448
USP kills on a map
41.616
Trades on a map
103.5084
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:24s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
40%
Anubis
33%
Ancient
25%
Overpass
21%
Inferno
17%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
20%
5
5
Nuke
0%
0
7
Anubis
17%
6
4
Ancient
40%
5
3
Overpass
29%
7
1
Inferno
70%
10
0
Mirage
50%
2
4
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
70%
23
3
Nuke
40%
5
30
Anubis
50%
6
23
Ancient
65%
17
8
Overpass
50%
16
14
Inferno
53%
32
0
Mirage
50%
12
14
Info
Match analysis of Katuna vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Katuna and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Katuna. The MVP of this match was rafftu.
Katuna analytics
The team Katuna secured 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Katuna were rafftu contributed 28 kills and h4rn contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9498 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Katuna held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were nbqq contributed 22 kills and Valencio contributed 18 kills. 8117 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent Katuna from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments