Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
58%
Inferno
46%
Dust II
42%
Anubis
K
37%
Nuke
K
25%
Vertigo
11%
Ancient
K
11%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
3
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Anubis
100%
3
0
Nuke
25%
4
0
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Ancient
75%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
58%
59
10
Inferno
46%
35
15
Dust II
42%
19
13
Anubis
63%
56
8
Nuke
0%
0
63
Vertigo
61%
44
8
Ancient
64%
74
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllll
- wlwlw
Info
Map Analysis of Kario Mart vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Ancient Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Ancient were ZeRRoFIX, who contributed 19 kills, and Jambo, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8610 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Kario Mart on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Kario Mart, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Kario Mart on Ancient included Simpan, who contributed 21 kills, and upE, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7850 total damage, Kario Mart couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Kario Mart struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments