0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
164.3478
Trades on a map
123.3972
Player score (round)
35791010
Damage (total/round)
40273
Player score (round)
44281010
Player score (round)
34671010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
67%
Ancient
66%
Dust II
30%
Vertigo
30%
Inferno
25%
Mirage
21%
Anubis
14%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
33%
9
2
Ancient
0%
0
11
Dust II
40%
10
2
Vertigo
25%
4
4
Inferno
25%
12
1
Mirage
74%
19
2
Anubis
64%
22
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
11
Ancient
66%
44
0
Dust II
70%
20
2
Vertigo
55%
11
4
Inferno
50%
20
4
Mirage
53%
19
4
Anubis
50%
34
1
Info
Match analysis of K27 vs L&G by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between K27 and L&G, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by K27. The MVP of this match was kL1okL1o.
K27 analytics
The team K27 secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for K27 were qw1nk1 contributed 31 kills and kashl1d contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11165 overall damage.
On the defensive side, K27 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
L&G analytics
The team L&G managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for L&G were kL1okL1o contributed 28 kills and kr1vda contributed 30 kills. 12148 of total damage by L&G could not prevent K27 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments