0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
70%
Ancient
43%
Overpass
38%
Vertigo
32%
Mirage
30%
Inferno
29%
Nuke
26%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
8
Ancient
100%
4
0
Overpass
100%
1
9
Vertigo
25%
4
4
Mirage
60%
5
0
Inferno
67%
9
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
70%
27
6
Ancient
57%
30
14
Overpass
62%
26
27
Vertigo
57%
30
6
Mirage
30%
20
52
Inferno
38%
21
45
Nuke
59%
39
12
Dust II
0%
1
6
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- lwwww
Info
Map Analysis of Juggernauts vs ECSTATIC by the Bo3.gg Team
ECSTATIC on Nuke Analysis
ECSTATIC demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ECSTATIC on Nuke were Nodios, who contributed 19 kills, and kraghen, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8867 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, ECSTATIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Juggernauts on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Juggernauts, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Juggernauts on Nuke included susp, who contributed 16 kills, and Katalic, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6931 total damage, Juggernauts couldn't prevent ECSTATIC from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Juggernauts struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments