0 Comments
102
99
24
+3
390
16:14
22
0
Inferno6.2
-2%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
75%
Overpass
50%
Ancient
32%
Dust II
30%
Mirage
13%
Inferno
9%
Nuke
6%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
6
Overpass
50%
2
4
Ancient
25%
4
4
Dust II
50%
2
5
Mirage
44%
9
0
Inferno
54%
13
0
Nuke
63%
8
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
25%
4
6
Overpass
100%
1
8
Ancient
57%
14
1
Dust II
20%
10
5
Mirage
57%
14
2
Inferno
63%
27
0
Nuke
69%
13
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- wlwww
Info
Match analysis of JiJieHao International vs KTRL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between JiJieHao International and KTRL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by KTRL. The MVP of this match was susp.
KTRL analytics
The team KTRL secured 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KTRL were susp contributed 27 kills and Katalic contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10990 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KTRL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
JiJieHao International analytics
The team JiJieHao International managed to secure 30 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for JiJieHao International were BluePho3nix contributed 29 kills and meztal contributed 21 kills. 11698 of total damage by JiJieHao International could not prevent KTRL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, JiJieHao International struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments