0 Comments
148
149
50
-1
384
20:21
36
2
-5%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.516.7
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
10730
Flash duration on a map (sec)
03:10s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
14530
Smoke thrown on a map
4415.0371
HE damage (avg/round)
11.53.4
Damage (total/round)
58473
Player score (round)
44831012
Player score (round)
37851012
Damage (total/round)
47973
Info
Map Analysis of JiJieHao International vs JPB by the Bo3.gg Team
JPB on Dust II Analysis
JPB demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 22 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for JPB on Dust II were PokemoN, who contributed 37 kills, and Nami, who added 30 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 15866 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, JPB held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
JiJieHao International on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for JiJieHao International, as they managed to secure 20 out of 42 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for JiJieHao International on Dust II included MOREE, who contributed 35 kills, and DavCost, who added 31 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 16133 total damage, JiJieHao International couldn't prevent JPB from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, JiJieHao International struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments