0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:30s
Galil kills on a map
41.807
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.15.6
AK47 kills on a map
136.7327
Player score (round)
42931012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
59%
Overpass
30%
Nuke
21%
Ancient
20%
Mirage
12%
Anubis
10%
Inferno
9%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
47
Overpass
30%
10
27
Nuke
47%
19
2
Ancient
43%
30
7
Mirage
55%
42
2
Anubis
38%
16
4
Inferno
29%
31
11
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
59%
37
0
Overpass
0%
1
39
Nuke
26%
19
12
Ancient
63%
40
0
Mirage
43%
23
14
Anubis
48%
27
4
Inferno
38%
13
11
Last results
Info
Match analysis of JANO vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between JANO and PGE Turow, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by PGE Turow. The MVP of this match was Markoś.
PGE Turow analytics
The team PGE Turow secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PGE Turow were Markoś contributed 67 kills and darko contributed 61 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32321 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PGE Turow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
JANO analytics
The team JANO managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for JANO were Jelo contributed 53 kills and zks contributed 44 kills. 28543 of total damage by JANO could not prevent PGE Turow from securing the victory
On the defensive side, JANO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments