68
81
11
-13
323
10:13
18
0
-9%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
113
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
Percentage of headshots
40%15%
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.52
Player score (round)
36321012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Molotov damage (total/round)
11223.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
55%
Vertigo
33%
Dust II
20%
Nuke
20%
Inferno
8%
Ancient
3%
Mirage
2%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
55%
11
5
Vertigo
0%
0
43
Dust II
68%
19
6
Nuke
58%
19
8
Inferno
50%
16
5
Ancient
63%
8
18
Mirage
46%
13
16
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
42
Vertigo
33%
9
13
Dust II
48%
21
13
Nuke
38%
24
11
Inferno
58%
31
5
Ancient
60%
15
9
Mirage
44%
18
8
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Isurus vs Meta by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Isurus and Meta, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Isurus. The MVP of this match was meyern.
Isurus analytics
The team Isurus secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Isurus were meyern contributed 24 kills and Noktse contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8830 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Meta analytics
The team Meta managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Meta were Leomonster contributed 17 kills and abr contributed 14 kills. 7421 of total damage by Meta could not prevent Isurus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Meta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments