0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.62
Molotov damage (avg/round)
12.92
Smoke thrown on a map
2715.0371
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
41701012
Shots (total/round)
8916
Player score (round)
35381012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
75%
Dust II
60%
Ancient
60%
Nuke
55%
Overpass
36%
Inferno
28%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
75%
8
7
Dust II
40%
5
16
Ancient
60%
10
7
Nuke
55%
20
5
Overpass
64%
14
4
Inferno
53%
17
10
Vertigo
0%
0
36
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
6
Dust II
100%
2
1
Ancient
0%
1
3
Nuke
0%
1
1
Overpass
100%
3
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Vertigo
0%
1
3
Info
Match analysis of Isurus vs LOS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Isurus and LOS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by Isurus. The MVP of this match was ALLE.
Isurus analytics
The team Isurus secured 32 out of 59 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Isurus were ALLE contributed 53 kills and Noktse contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21089 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOS analytics
The team LOS managed to secure 27 out of 59 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOS were mawth contributed 46 kills and caike contributed 43 kills. 20845 of total damage by LOS could not prevent Isurus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments