0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 damage (avg/round)
66.125.3
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:31s00:39s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.916.7
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
42111012
Player score (round)
41501012
Shots (total/round)
9516
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37801012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
64%
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
47%
Mirage
43%
Overpass
19%
Nuke
19%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
64%
11
4
Vertigo
0%
0
29
Dust II
64%
11
10
Mirage
57%
7
9
Overpass
82%
11
3
Nuke
57%
23
5
Inferno
67%
18
6
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
25
Vertigo
50%
6
11
Dust II
17%
6
11
Mirage
100%
5
10
Overpass
63%
8
1
Nuke
38%
8
7
Inferno
65%
20
1
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Isurus vs Leviatan by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Isurus and Leviatan, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Isurus. The MVP of this match was deco.
Isurus analytics
The team Isurus secured 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Isurus were deco contributed 28 kills and Noktse contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10950 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Leviatan analytics
The team Leviatan managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Leviatan were 1962 contributed 18 kills and fakzwall contributed 16 kills. 9199 of total damage by Leviatan could not prevent Isurus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Leviatan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments