0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
10.72
AWP kills on a map
186.5798
HE kills on a map
31.127
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
44431012
Shots (total/round)
8816
Player score (round)
36041012
Shots (total/round)
10716
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
80%
Inferno
51%
Ancient
50%
Mirage
20%
Overpass
17%
Nuke
17%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
9
Inferno
29%
7
8
Ancient
50%
4
4
Mirage
80%
5
2
Overpass
50%
8
1
Nuke
67%
9
5
Vertigo
0%
0
18
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
5
0
Inferno
80%
5
1
Ancient
0%
0
7
Mirage
100%
1
7
Overpass
33%
3
3
Nuke
50%
6
5
Vertigo
0%
0
6
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Isurus vs Leviatan by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Isurus and Leviatan, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Isurus. The MVP of this match was BK1.
Isurus analytics
The team Isurus secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Isurus were BK1 contributed 24 kills and fakzwall contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9882 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Isurus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Leviatan analytics
The team Leviatan managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Leviatan were pavv contributed 16 kills and 1962 contributed 17 kills. 8043 of total damage by Leviatan could not prevent Isurus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Leviatan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments