0 Comments
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
56%
Mirage
37%
Ancient
33%
Inferno
14%
Dust II
4%
Nuke
3%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
56%
9
1
Mirage
63%
16
1
Ancient
0%
0
14
Inferno
59%
17
2
Dust II
79%
19
0
Nuke
50%
8
4
Overpass
0%
3
8
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
5
Mirage
100%
10
0
Ancient
33%
3
2
Inferno
45%
11
1
Dust II
75%
4
4
Nuke
53%
15
1
Overpass
0%
2
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwww
- wllwl
Info
Map Analysis of Iron Branch vs NASR by the Bo3.gg Team
NASR on Dust II Analysis
NASR demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 0 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for NASR on Dust II were almazer, who contributed 27 kills, and REAL1ZE, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9255 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, NASR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Iron Branch on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Iron Branch, as they managed to secure 23 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Iron Branch on Dust II included SENSEi, who contributed 18 kills, and sad, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8451 total damage, Iron Branch couldn't prevent NASR from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Iron Branch struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments