Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
76%
Dust II
61%
Vertigo
22%
Nuke
19%
Mirage
19%
Ancient
10%
Inferno
9%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
76%
17
11
Dust II
61%
23
1
Vertigo
33%
9
10
Nuke
23%
13
7
Mirage
75%
28
1
Ancient
50%
2
26
Inferno
59%
29
2
Anubis
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
2
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
55%
11
0
Nuke
42%
12
0
Mirage
56%
9
0
Ancient
40%
5
2
Inferno
50%
10
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- llwwl
Info
Match analysis of Iron Branch vs Leo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Iron Branch and Leo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by Iron Branch. The MVP of this match was kensizor.
Iron Branch analytics
The team Iron Branch secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Iron Branch were kensizor contributed 42 kills and Ganginho contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18137 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Leo analytics
The team Leo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Leo were kr1vda contributed 36 kills and Malkiss contributed 27 kills. 14846 of total damage by Leo could not prevent Iron Branch from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Leo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments