Iron Branch Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

16

11

+5

92

5:4

6

1

7.0

+18%

21

17

2

+4

75

5:1

4

0

6.9

+12%

21

19

6

+2

83

4:2

6

0

6.7

+1%

16

14

3

+2

62

1:2

4

1

5.9

+3%

16

19

5

-3

65

1:1

4

0

5.7

-7%

Total

95

85

27

+10

378

16:10

24

2

6.4

+6%

ECLOT Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

17

0

+9

106

7:1

7

0

7.9

+22%

15

18

3

-3

69

1:2

2

0

5.5

-9%

16

19

6

-3

69

0:5

5

0

5.1

0%

14

22

4

-8

69

2:4

3

0

5.1

-19%

12

19

2

-7

50

0:4

2

1

4.7

-19%

Total

83

95

15

-12

363

10:16

19

1

5.7

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Iron Branch vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team

Iron Branch on Inferno Analysis

Iron Branch demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Iron Branch on Inferno were MaSvAl, who contributed 21 kills, and bon1s, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9820 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ECLOT on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ECLOT, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno included anarkez, who contributed 26 kills, and nbqq, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9450 total damage, ECLOT couldn't prevent Iron Branch from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date