0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Overpass
50%
Anubis
43%
Mirage
29%
Vertigo
23%
Inferno
8%
Ancient
7%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
5
8
Anubis
0%
0
8
Mirage
73%
11
2
Vertigo
67%
3
7
Inferno
50%
16
1
Ancient
50%
2
6
Nuke
53%
15
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
4
Overpass
50%
12
3
Anubis
43%
7
1
Mirage
44%
9
7
Vertigo
44%
25
0
Inferno
42%
12
6
Ancient
57%
14
3
Nuke
55%
22
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of Invictus International vs Viperio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Invictus International and Viperio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Invictus International. The MVP of this match was facecrack.
Invictus International analytics
The team Invictus International secured 0 out of 55 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Invictus International were facecrack contributed 54 kills and meztal contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21934 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Invictus International held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio managed to secure 55 out of 55 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Viperio were bevve contributed 39 kills and Girafffe contributed 37 kills. 20152 of total damage by Viperio could not prevent Invictus International from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Viperio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 30 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments