0 Comments
92
77
27
+15
383
15:11
19
2
+8%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Records Vertigo
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:22s01:30s
HE damage (avg/round)
153.4
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0373
Damage (total/round)
40073
Shots (total/round)
8416
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
13426.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:19s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of Into the Breach vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Vertigo Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Vertigo were nEMANHA, who contributed 23 kills, and brutmonster, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 9950 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Into the Breach on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Into the Breach, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Into the Breach on Vertigo included NEOFRAG, who contributed 20 kills, and CRUC1AL, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8901 total damage, Into the Breach couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Into the Breach struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments