0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
30%
Inferno
25%
Nuke
21%
Vertigo
20%
Overpass
13%
Mirage
13%
Ancient
10%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
40%
5
32
Inferno
72%
39
6
Nuke
54%
28
12
Vertigo
40%
20
26
Overpass
55%
22
12
Mirage
69%
39
3
Ancient
46%
13
24
Last 5 maps
Dust II
10%
10
6
Inferno
47%
17
1
Nuke
33%
9
5
Vertigo
20%
5
6
Overpass
42%
12
0
Mirage
56%
9
7
Ancient
56%
16
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- lwlll
Info
Map Analysis of Into the Breach vs VELOX by the Bo3.gg Team
Into the Breach on Inferno Analysis
Into the Breach demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Into the Breach on Inferno were dobbo, who contributed 24 kills, and CYPHER, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10919 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Into the Breach held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
VELOX on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for VELOX, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for VELOX on Inferno included tutehen, who contributed 24 kills, and NaOw, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9690 total damage, VELOX couldn't prevent Into the Breach from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, VELOX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments