0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
51%
Inferno
26%
Mirage
18%
Ancient
17%
Dust II
7%
Vertigo
5%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
24%
17
18
Inferno
68%
41
5
Mirage
75%
32
6
Ancient
57%
23
12
Dust II
40%
10
22
Vertigo
55%
11
38
Nuke
50%
28
12
Last 5 maps
Overpass
75%
4
5
Inferno
42%
12
3
Mirage
57%
7
3
Ancient
40%
5
5
Dust II
33%
3
14
Vertigo
50%
2
6
Nuke
50%
2
14
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwwl
- lllll
Info
Match analysis of Into the Breach vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Into the Breach and Case, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by Into the Breach. The MVP of this match was CYPHER.
Into the Breach analytics
The team Into the Breach secured 38 out of 62 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Into the Breach were CYPHER contributed 52 kills and smooya contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23403 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Into the Breach held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Case analytics
The team Case managed to secure 24 out of 62 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Case were f4stzin contributed 40 kills and steel contributed 36 kills. 19817 of total damage by Case could not prevent Into the Breach from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Case struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments