0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
50%
Overpass
46%
Vertigo
43%
Inferno
41%
Dust II
40%
Mirage
36%
Nuke
31%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
50%
14
24
Overpass
54%
24
12
Vertigo
43%
21
25
Inferno
74%
38
7
Dust II
40%
5
34
Mirage
69%
39
3
Nuke
58%
26
12
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
4
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Inferno
33%
3
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
33%
6
0
Nuke
27%
11
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- wwwwl
Info
Match analysis of Into the Breach vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Into the Breach and ARCRED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Into the Breach. The MVP of this match was Adam9130.
Into the Breach analytics
The team Into the Breach secured 0 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Into the Breach were Adam9130 contributed 25 kills and draken contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10466 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Into the Breach held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED managed to secure 27 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARCRED were Ryujin contributed 19 kills and DSSj contributed 14 kills. 8877 of total damage by ARCRED could not prevent Into the Breach from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARCRED struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments