0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
104.491
M4A1 kills on a map
84.491
USP kills on a map
31.6074
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3023
USP kills on a map
31.6074
Percentage of headshots
50%15%
USP kills on a map
41.6074
Headshots on a map
170.3141
Player score (round)
35851011
Player score (round)
36961011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
35%
Vertigo
26%
Ancient
11%
Mirage
3%
Anubis
1%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
52%
21
3
Vertigo
53%
15
6
Ancient
61%
23
10
Mirage
47%
15
9
Anubis
60%
30
1
Inferno
0%
0
32
Last 5 maps
Nuke
17%
6
4
Vertigo
27%
11
0
Ancient
50%
2
8
Mirage
50%
10
2
Anubis
61%
23
0
Inferno
0%
0
9
Info
Match analysis of Insilio vs V1dar by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Insilio and V1dar, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Insilio. The MVP of this match was faydett.
Insilio analytics
The team Insilio secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Insilio were faydett contributed 21 kills and FpSSS contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7290 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Insilio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
V1dar analytics
The team V1dar managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for V1dar were 4X1s contributed 12 kills and Alv contributed 12 kills. 4605 of total damage by V1dar could not prevent Insilio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, V1dar struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments