0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6107
Trades on a map
9.033.4876
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Player score (round)
34851011
Player score (round)
37121011
Player score (round)
36351011
Player score (round)
36051011
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
70%
Mirage
62%
Vertigo
32%
Nuke
31%
Inferno
30%
Ancient
17%
Anubis
1%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
5
9
Mirage
38%
8
3
Vertigo
40%
5
0
Nuke
30%
10
6
Inferno
0%
0
18
Ancient
44%
9
4
Anubis
59%
17
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
30%
10
17
Mirage
100%
1
28
Vertigo
72%
18
1
Nuke
61%
18
5
Inferno
30%
10
6
Ancient
61%
38
4
Anubis
58%
19
7
Info
Match analysis of Insilio vs FTW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Insilio and FTW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Insilio. The MVP of this match was sugaR.
Insilio analytics
The team Insilio secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Insilio were sugaR contributed 26 kills and FpSSS contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8907 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Insilio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FTW analytics
The team FTW managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FTW were Ag1L contributed 19 kills and PR contributed 14 kills. 7217 of total damage by FTW could not prevent Insilio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FTW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments