0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.14.1
M4A4 kills on a map
93.4454
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
40.512
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.5022
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.35.9
Player score (round)
43501010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
60%
Vertigo
57%
Inferno
31%
Mirage
23%
Nuke
19%
Ancient
4%
Anubis
4%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
60%
15
16
Vertigo
0%
0
33
Inferno
70%
23
5
Mirage
40%
15
17
Nuke
55%
22
5
Ancient
64%
28
5
Anubis
53%
15
6
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
43
Vertigo
57%
30
2
Inferno
39%
23
28
Mirage
63%
35
14
Nuke
36%
36
28
Ancient
60%
30
15
Anubis
57%
30
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of inSanitY vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between inSanitY and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was pesadelo.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps . They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were Koala contributed 18 kills and rdnzao contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7561 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
inSanitY analytics
The team inSanitY managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for inSanitY were pesadelo contributed 21 kills and shz contributed 19 kills. 9061 of total damage by inSanitY could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, inSanitY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments