0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6107
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3025
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:54s
Player score (round)
34691011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Ancient
56%
Vertigo
35%
Anubis
29%
Nuke
17%
Inferno
11%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
1
Ancient
67%
15
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Anubis
0%
0
2
Nuke
33%
3
0
Inferno
75%
4
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
4
4
Ancient
11%
18
4
Vertigo
35%
17
3
Anubis
29%
17
2
Nuke
50%
18
3
Inferno
86%
7
6
Mirage
0%
1
12
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwlw
- wlllw
Info
Match analysis of INGLORIOUS vs Verdant by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between INGLORIOUS and Verdant, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by INGLORIOUS. The MVP of this match was LaYm.
INGLORIOUS analytics
The team INGLORIOUS secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for INGLORIOUS were LaYm contributed 21 kills and DrobnY contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9180 overall damage.
On the defensive side, INGLORIOUS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Verdant analytics
The team Verdant managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Verdant were Ducky contributed 22 kills and Girafffe contributed 16 kills. 8049 of total damage by Verdant could not prevent INGLORIOUS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Verdant struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments