0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4429
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:35s01:54s
Player score (round)
35091011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
75%
Vertigo
67%
Mirage
50%
Anubis
43%
Ancient
29%
Overpass
25%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
75%
4
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Mirage
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
2
Ancient
62%
13
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
2
0
Vertigo
67%
3
3
Mirage
50%
8
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Ancient
33%
9
0
Overpass
25%
4
1
Nuke
0%
0
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwwl
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of INGLORIOUS vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between INGLORIOUS and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by NOM. The MVP of this match was Libido.
NOM analytics
The team NOM secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NOM were Libido contributed 26 kills and ultimate contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9303 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NOM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
INGLORIOUS analytics
The team INGLORIOUS managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for INGLORIOUS were Jad0R1x contributed 18 kills and Esphirion contributed 19 kills. 8187 of total damage by INGLORIOUS could not prevent NOM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, INGLORIOUS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments