0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Ancient
67%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
2
0
Ancient
67%
6
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Nuke
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwwl
- lw
Info
Map Analysis of INGLORIOUS vs Bleiz by the Bo3.gg Team
INGLORIOUS on Inferno Analysis
INGLORIOUS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for INGLORIOUS on Inferno were Esphirion, who contributed 22 kills, and LaYm, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9148 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, INGLORIOUS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bleiz on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Bleiz, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bleiz on Inferno included day0s, who contributed 19 kills, and m4tthi, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6964 total damage, Bleiz couldn't prevent INGLORIOUS from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Bleiz struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments