IN.GAME Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

18

4

-1

88

2:1

3

3

6.8

-3%

16

19

2

-3

79

3:3

5

0

5.9

+5%

14

20

2

-6

62

4:3

4

0

5.5

-9%

12

18

0

-6

45

0:4

3

0

4.5

-25%

8

22

3

-14

46

1:4

1

0

4.2

-36%

Total

67

97

11

-30

320

10:15

16

3

5.4

-14%

Akuma Scoreboard Dust II (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

15

3

+9

90

2:1

7

1

7.6

+20%

20

13

7

+7

97

3:2

5

0

6.9

+28%

21

14

3

+7

83

4:4

6

0

6.7

+9%

16

12

5

+4

58

4:1

4

0

6.2

-14%

15

15

5

0

74

2:2

4

0

5.6

+7%

Total

96

69

23

+27

402

15:10

26

1

6.6

+10%

Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of IN.GAME vs Akuma by the Bo3.gg Team

Akuma on Dust II Analysis

Akuma demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Akuma on Dust II were Sergiz, who contributed 24 kills, and j3kie, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10043 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, Akuma held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


IN.GAME on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for IN.GAME, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for IN.GAME on Dust II included Gospadarov, who contributed 17 kills, and fabi, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8004 total damage, IN.GAME couldn't prevent Akuma from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, IN.GAME struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date